Mijares Group

Research, modelling and operating standards

Evidence before advice. Including when the evidence says no.

Take a problem. Go to the primary literature, not the summary of it. Build the model from public data. Validate it against something independent, and say where it fails. The sector changes. The standard of proof does not.

The group

Three lines of work, one standard of proof.

Analytics answers where to put it and whether the economics hold. Advisory answers how it runs once it is there. Learning builds instruction from what the research actually supports. Different problems, different sectors, sold separately, and built on the same rule: name the source or do not make the claim.

Division

Mijares Group Analytics

Base siting, coverage and competitive position across a seven-state footprint. Transport economics, payer mix and break-even volume. Home of Meridian, the interactive siting and coverage tool.

  • 104 air medical bases mapped across seven states
  • 565 counties scored for demand, payer mix and access
  • Break-even model validated against an independent actuarial study
Division

Mijares Group Advisory

Operating standards built around eight pillars, from aviation and clinical through dispatch, billing and business development. Written first for air medical. The structure carries to any operation running crews, assets and a compliance burden. KPI-driven, implementable without a capital budget.

  • Pillars of Excellence operational playbook
  • Referral relationship and communication standards
  • Program assessment against defined, measurable KPIs
Division

Mijares Group Learning

Instruction and practice tools for children who learn differently, built from the federal practice guides, the published norms and the intervention literature rather than from what sells. First application: Able Minds Lab, reading and number fact fluency for a child with dyslexia and ADHD.

  • Targets set from national oral reading fluency norms, read from the source report
  • Mastery gated on evidence earned across separate days, not on a single good session
  • Every activity traceable to the practice guide behind it

We tested the published site-ranking models our own industry sells. They do not predict outcomes, p = 0.86. We publish that rather than sell one.

The method

The same four steps, whatever the problem.

01

Read the primary sources

The technical report, not the summary of it. No name, number, date or rate appears without the file it came from. Public data wherever possible, so a client can check the work.

02

Validate against something independent

A separate method on separate data, not the data that built the model. Our break-even estimate lands within 1.6% of an independently published actuarial study.

03

Separate fact from judgment

Every deliverable marks what was verified, what is professional judgment, and what only the client can confirm from their own book.

04

Say where it fails

Out loud, in the deliverable. A finding that kills an idea is worth more than one that flatters it, and a model reported only on its wins is not a model.